ADVERTISEMENT

Israel is bombing Iran...

What you refuse to understand is that nobody is talking about a 20 year occupation. Something more along the lines of that Iranian f@g trump killed in the first term and what he did with ISIS. Remember those right?
Like I said, dropping a bomb and walking away is the best case scenario, and that’s what they’re trying to pitch. But it won’t go that way. Hey if it does, more power to these guys. The last month has still been a dumb screw around, costing us billions for no reason, but whatever all in a days work for the US gov.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: nail1988
All we have to see is his Butters McElwain av, as the reason nobody takes Bradley seriously around here. I have to say I enjoy his football posts.
Football hoops and baseball are important. All this stuff is arguing about rearranging the deck chairs on the titanic.

Or more accurately, arguing about politics is basically like arguing about who’s going to captain the titanic in the hour after it hit the iceberg.

It’s actually amazing how similar politics is to SEC football. People just have their teams or their coaches and that’s it. No sense trying to reason it out.

One thing we can all agree about: if the last month in the Middle East had unfolded with Kamala or Biden or Obama in the White House, you guys would be ready to march on the White House, and rightfully so.

But it’s Trump delivering you the message so you just accept it no questions.
 
Last edited:
The whole thing is pointless, which is what I said 7 pages ago and is becoming increasingly obvious. We’re not going to verifiably eliminate their nuclear capabilities or change their leadership without putting troops in and nobody wants to do that.

If we do put troops in we’ll probably spend 10 years and 10 trillion to zero effect just like we did in Iraq and Afghanistan. Meanwhile our real hostile competitors are in the Pacific, and they’re not pissing away money or resources on this nonsense.

Best case is to lob a bunch of missiles at them and then announce mission accomplished and walk away. That will have zero effect also, but at least we’ll spend $50 billion instead of trillions.
Son.....I have told you this, now LISTEN to me. Leave the manly stuff to US...your side is incapable of doing ANYTHING manly. You are wrong AGAIN.

1. The object of this conflict is to END Irans nuclear weapon capability, NOT fight a war. I know you are not equipped to understand any of this stuff, its not in your DNA. PLEASE stick to something you KNOW...like "man" bun styles, defending illegal aliens, and other stuff democrats are good at. Defending American interests is just NOTY something any of you could EVER understand...see Afghanistan withdrawal...then you will understand better. If that does not work...try reading about the hostage rescue ATTEPMT in Iran in 1980. Stay in your lane....
 
Son.....I have told you this, now LISTEN to me. Leave the manly stuff to US...your side is incapable of doing ANYTHING manly. You are wrong AGAIN.

1. The object of this conflict is to END Irans nuclear weapon capability, NOT fight a war. I know you are not equipped to understand any of this stuff, it’s not in your DNA. PLEASE stick to something you KNOW...like "man" bun styles, defending illegal aliens, and other stuff democrats are good at. Defending American interests is just NOTY something any of you could EVER understand...see Afghanistan withdrawal...then you will understand better. If that does not work...try reading about the hostage rescue ATTEPMT in Iran in 1980. Stay in your lane....
So if it were up to you we’d still have troops in Afghanistan. Nuff said.

By the way, Sgt Slaughter, you ever serve? Or you just talk tough with other people’s lives?
 
Football hoops and baseball are important. All this stuff is arguing about rearranging the deck chairs on the titanic.

Or more accurately, arguing about politics is basically like arguing about who’s going to captain the titanic in the hour after it hit the iceberg.

It’s actually amazing how similar politics is to SEC football. People just have their teams or their coaches and that’s it. No sense trying to reason it out.

One thing we can all agree about: if the last month in the Middle East had unfolded with Kamala or Biden or Obama in the White House, you guys would be ready to march on the White House, and rightfully so.

But it’s Trump delivering you the message so you just accept it no questions.
Of course I disagree, Tinkerbelle. DISCUSSING politics and listening to the other side, as contentious as it gets is VERY healthy.
 
So if it were up to you we’d still have troops in Afghanistan. Nuff said.

By the way, Sgt Slaughter, you ever serve? Or you just talk tough with other people’s lives?
Just point out ANYWHERE on ANY thread here where I EVER said that. Now what I DO know is that it was IDIOTIC(just like a lefty trying to do war) to close our base in Bagram while thousands of Americans were behind enemy lines, and BILLIONS of dollars of military equipment were STILL in theater. And YES, I would have never closed Bagram. I am 100% sure you are unaware of this...but China now occupies that base. Explain how that helped the USA.
 
Football hoops and baseball are important. All this stuff is arguing about rearranging the deck chairs on the titanic.

Or more accurately, arguing about politics is basically like arguing about who’s going to captain the titanic in the hour after it hit the iceberg.

It’s actually amazing how similar politics is to SEC football. People just have their teams or their coaches and that’s it. No sense trying to reason it out.

One thing we can all agree about: if the last month in the Middle East had unfolded with Kamala or Biden or Obama in the White House, you guys would be ready to march on the White House, and rightfully so.

But it’s Trump delivering you the message so you just accept it no questions.

If a Dem restrained themselves to finishing off that nuclear facility and only responding if we are attacked with no ground forces I would be alright with it. Iran doesn't need to have nukes.
 
If a Dem restrained themselves to finishing off that nuclear facility and only responding if we are attacked with no ground forces I would be alright with it. Iran doesn't need to have nukes.
This is something a huge majority of Americans agree on. However lefties, even the ones here only criticize Trump. NOT ONE has come up with a plan to accomplish it. Probably because they do not understand how it could be done. They are not like us.
 
One thing we can all agree about: if the last month in the Middle East had unfolded with Kamala or Biden or Obama in the White House, you guys would be ready to march on the White House, and rightfully so.

But it’s Trump delivering you the message so you just accept it no questions.
"Boy you guys are something else! McElwain says Florida needs to get better offensively and yall attack him. But then Spurrier says the same thing, and you guys accept it no questions!"

Yeah! We're all just partisan political hacks just like you, bradley!
 
If a Dem restrained themselves to finishing off that nuclear facility and only responding if we are attacked with no ground forces I would be alright with it. Iran doesn't need to have nukes.
@bradley is now in the 'Look, none of know what will happen" stage. He's here ITT for the same reason why he had to go there in the tariffs thread. Cause his initial criticisms blew up in his face.

Same will happen here. The conflict will end in a few days/weeks/months, Trump will get credit for it, bradley will kick rocks and sulk off to find another topic in another thread to be wrong about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gators2014
I’d suggest we start focusing our attention, money and resources on China, which is an actual threat, military and otherwise, and quit chasing the same neocon bogeyman that we’ve spent the last 30 years and lord knows how many trillions chasing for absolutely no effect.
So you’re cool with Iran having nuclear weapons?

You think Khomeini will only use them as a deterrent?
 
@bradley is now in the 'Look, none of know what will happen" stage. He's here ITT for the same reason why he had to go there in the tariffs thread. Cause his initial criticisms blew up in his face.

Same will happen here. The conflict will end in a few days/weeks/months, Trump will get credit for it, bradley will kick rocks and sulk off to find another topic in another thread to be wrong about.
just like EVERY SINGLE premonition he has had since he came here. He KNOWS NOTHING about world events. I find it hard to believe someone can be wrong 100% of the time...especially when it is not multiple choice..these issues are mostly either "do or do not", or "this or that". He chooses wrong EVERY time.
 


Here argue with this guy. So you guys ALL think the reversal on all of this rhetoric is that theres smoking gun new evidence that now Iran is weeks away from a bomb, for really real this time?

Or you guys just don’t think about it and just march to whatever he tweeted last?
Ok so Trump is lying just to start a “forever war” (absolute no sign we’re putting boots on the ground) to gain what?
 
just like EVERY SINGLE premonition he has had since he came here. He KNOWS NOTHING about world events. I find it hard to believe someone can be wrong 100% of the time...especially when it is not multiple choice..these issues are mostly either "do or do not", or "this or that". He chooses wrong EVERY time.
It's not just that he's ignorant of the topics, he literally has no idea what the basic terms mean. In the tariffs thread, he once claimed that Trump needed to drop the idea of tariffs, and instead focus on taxing Chinese companies.

He literally argues against his own positions, and has no idea he's doing so. It's fascinating to watch.
 
He's definitely contentious or purposely obtuse, no one can be that ignorant unless he's a millennial.
just like EVERY SINGLE premonition he has had since he came here. He KNOWS NOTHING about world events. I find it hard to believe someone can be wrong 100% of the time...especially when it is not multiple choice..these issues are mostly either "do or do not", or "this or that". He chooses wrong every single time.
 
We will not let them use anything. They do not have the ability. WE will fly B2’s with 30k buster busters, but I think it will be more than even that. Shiz about to get REAL
It just got real a few hours ago. Good call.

Good bless America. Give Trump credit for making a hard call, and damn this was a tough call.

Pros and cons to it.
 
Look at all you bootlickers…. Now going to war is totally fine… you follow any narrative that they push… don’t even realize you’re in a cult… American soldiers going to war for absolutely no reason
If we get into regime change, I will agree with you. This was to take out nuclear strikes and proliferation.

By the way, guess who agrees with you: Tucker, MTG, Bannon, Ro Khanna, AOC and others including Rep. Massie.

In short, it’s a non-linear issue
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gators2014
Look at all you bootlickers…. Now going to war is totally fine… you follow any narrative that they push… don’t even realize you’re in a cult… American soldiers going to war for absolutely no reason

Hopefully Iran doesn't get stupid but those facilities had to go. I guess we will see what they try and do soon.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
OSZAR »