What happens if Iran hits a nuke plant with one of these? Some people claim they will be going after one.
I'd like to think the air defense around a nuke power plant would be pretty stout.
What happens if Iran hits a nuke plant with one of these? Some people claim they will be going after one.
So a 30k lb MOAB on top of their nuclear enrichment site won't do anything?The whole thing is pointless, which is what I said 7 pages ago and is becoming increasingly obvious. We’re not going to verifiably eliminate their nuclear capabilities or change their leadership without putting troops in and nobody wants to do that.
If we do put troops in we’ll probably spend 10 years and 10 trillion to zero effect just like we did in Iraq and Afghanistan. Meanwhile our real hostile competitors are in the Pacific, and they’re not pissing away money or resources on this nonsense.
Best case is to lob a bunch of missiles at them and then announce mission accomplished and walk away. That will have zero effect also, but at least we’ll spend $50 billion instead of trillions.
You let Bath House Barry control your thinking.
So I don’t know anything about Charlie Kirk, but he strikes me as someone who you all may let do your thinking for you.
Is this why this thread is dying because the MAGA influencers are now saying what I’ve been saying throughout this thread, so now you all have to stand down? Sad!
I'd like to think the air defense around a nuke power plant would be pretty stout.
The whole thing is pointless, which is what I said 7 pages ago and is becoming increasingly obvious. We’re not going to verifiably eliminate their nuclear capabilities or change their leadership without putting troops in and nobody wants to do that.
If we do put troops in we’ll probably spend 10 years and 10 trillion to zero effect just like we did in Iraq and Afghanistan. Meanwhile our real hostile competitors are in the Pacific, and they’re not pissing away money or resources on this nonsense.
Best case is to lob a bunch of missiles at them and then announce mission accomplished and walk away. That will have zero effect also, but at least we’ll spend $50 billion instead of trillions.
Wouldnt even need to big boy really, a MOP is the same weight with a slightly lower yield.So a 30k lb MOAB on top of their nuclear enrichment site won't do anything?
Did you eat lead paint chips as a kid?
How would you suggest Trump and Israel deal with the threat of nuclear Iran...I'm still waiting on your plan. Or are you ok with Tel Aviv being turned to glass or a mushroom cloud over NYC?
"Look let's be honest, none of us know what's going on here".So a 30k lb MOAB on top of their nuclear enrichment site won't do anything?
Did you eat lead paint chips as a kid?
How would you suggest Trump and Israel deal with the threat of nuclear Iran...I'm still waiting on your plan. Or are you ok with Tel Aviv being turned to glass or a mushroom cloud over NYC?
You are welcome to leave the thread and allow the adults to discuss it.The whole thing is pointless, which is what I said 7 pages ago and is becoming increasingly obvious. We’re not going to verifiably eliminate their nuclear capabilities or change their leadership without putting troops in and nobody wants to do that.
If we do put troops in we’ll probably spend 10 years and 10 trillion to zero effect just like we did in Iraq and Afghanistan. Meanwhile our real hostile competitors are in the Pacific, and they’re not pissing away money or resources on this nonsense.
Best case is to lob a bunch of missiles at them and then announce mission accomplished and walk away. That will have zero effect also, but at least we’ll spend $50 billion instead of trillions.
I’d suggest we start focusing our attention, money and resources on China, which is an actual threat, military and otherwise, and quit chasing the same neocon bogeyman that we’ve spent the last 30 years and lord knows how many trillions chasing for absolutely no effect.So a 30k lb MOAB on top of their nuclear enrichment site won't do anything?
Did you eat lead paint chips as a kid?
How would you suggest Trump and Israel deal with the threat of nuclear Iran...I'm still waiting on your plan. Or are you ok with Tel Aviv being turned to glass or a mushroom cloud over NYC?
I’d suggest we start focusing our attention, money and resources on China, which is an actual threat, military and otherwise, and quit chasing the same neocon bogeyman that we’ve spent the last 30 years and lord knows how many trillions chasing for absolutely no effect.
Way to keep your eye on the ball Brad ...I’d suggest we start focusing our attention, money and resources on China, which is an actual threat, military and otherwise, and quit chasing the same neocon bogeyman that we’ve spent the last 30 years and lord knows how many trillions chasing for absolutely no effect.
This is from the poster who spent the last month bitching about Trump pushing tariffs against China.I’d suggest we start focusing our attention, money and resources on China, which is an actual threat, military and otherwise, and quit chasing the same neocon bogeyman that we’ve spent the last 30 years and lord knows how many trillions chasing for absolutely no effect.
Really? I’m pretty sure one of our bunker busters can absolutely bury those UG facilities. As far as verification, mossad was able to build an entire base in Tehran right under their noses. I think we may be able to figure out if we cleaned this all up without a massive land invasion. I think any regime change should come organically from the people of IranThe whole thing is pointless, which is what I said 7 pages ago and is becoming increasingly obvious. We’re not going to verifiably eliminate their nuclear capabilities or change their leadership without putting troops in and nobody wants to do that.
If we do put troops in we’ll probably spend 10 years and 10 trillion to zero effect just like we did in Iraq and Afghanistan. Meanwhile our real hostile competitors are in the Pacific, and they’re not pissing away money or resources on this nonsense.
Best case is to lob a bunch of missiles at them and then announce mission accomplished and walk away. That will have zero effect also, but at least we’ll spend $50 billion instead of trillions.
It’s been advertised on late night TV as the Jew-B-Gone …Israel really jumped the gun on this thing. Just because Irans missile system is called “the Jew Annihilator 5000” doesn’t mean Iran wanted to do them harm.
Did trump not campaign on “ Iran can never have nukes”? Pretty sure he did.I mean they’ve supposedly been two weeks away from nuking Israel for literally 30 years. They were two weeks away when Trump (correctly) campaigned on staying the hell out of the Middle East.
We’ve got bigger fish to fry. Threats that actually have the ability to impact our standard of living and safety. Again, everything I’m saying is from Trumps campaign. Draw your own conclusions as to why that’s all out the window (or don’t, probably).
Did trump not campaign on “ Iran can never have nukes”? Pretty sure he did.
And yet he campaigned against Middle East wars. Does that tell you anything?He’s been saying it since 2012
Well playedIt’s been advertised on late night TV as the Jew-B-Gone …
I don't have anyone on ignore, but you are close ....
Here argue with this guy. So you guys ALL think the reversal on all of this rhetoric is that theres smoking gun new evidence that now Iran is weeks away from a bomb, for really real this time?
Or you guys just don’t think about it and just march to whatever he tweeted last?
We actually listen to what Trump says. You listen to other TDS patients tell you about Trump. That's why you have no idea what you are talking about.
Here argue with this guy. So you guys ALL think the reversal on all of this rhetoric is that theres smoking gun new evidence that now Iran is weeks away from a bomb, for really real this time?
Or you guys just don’t think about it and just march to whatever he tweeted last?
What you refuse to understand is that nobody is talking about a 20 year occupation. Something more along the lines of that Iranian f@g trump killed in the first term and what he did with ISIS. Remember those right?
Here argue with this guy. So you guys ALL think the reversal on all of this rhetoric is that theres smoking gun new evidence that now Iran is weeks away from a bomb, for really real this time?
Or you guys just don’t think about it and just march to whatever he tweeted last?
All we have to see is his Butters McElwain av, as the reason nobody takes Bradley seriously around here. I have to say I enjoy his football posts.And cant understand why he isnt taken more seriously here.
Most liberals make good sense until they start talking politics.All we have to see is his Butters McElwain av, as the reason nobody takes Bradley seriously around here. I have to say I enjoy his football posts.
Shannon Terry is pretty smart. Unless there is a massive upkeep expense to these boards that I'm not aware of, I can't see the business case for nixing them. But stranger things have happened.UNRELATED:
i'm going to miss most of you if this board goes away ...
I agree, but can't help but think the Rivals team boards will be folded into the On3 ones, just my opinion, but who knows.Shannon Terry is pretty smart. Unless there is a massive upkeep expense to these boards that I'm not aware of, I can't see the business case for nixing them. But stranger things have happened.
It's been a good run since Gatorbait. But nobody lives forever. In honor of your honorable modship, if that happens, I promise to go out in a blaze of glory. 😂I agree, but can't help but think the Rivals team boards will be folded into the On3 ones, just my opinion, but who knows.
He said the rivals MB will stay, but many will leave if it's moderated badly ...